{"id":129,"date":"2011-05-24T12:57:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-24T12:57:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/?p=129"},"modified":"2022-01-07T08:45:08","modified_gmt":"2022-01-07T13:45:08","slug":"the-case-for-mark-versus-paul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/?p=129","title":{"rendered":"JR43: The Case for "Mark Versus Paul""},"content":{"rendered":"
\"\"<\/a>

Study of the Gospel of Thomas, which has strong links to the Q Source and the Synoptic Gospels, makes it easier to see what Jesus was actually saying and how Jesus’ teachings differed radically from Paul’s teachings. Ceiling mosaic in the original Queen’s Park entrance of the Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto. Photo credit JAT 2017.<\/p><\/div>\n

\u00a0A: Today, I’m shifting back into academic mode on the question of what Jesus actually taught 2,000 years ago — as opposed to what the Church says<\/em> he taught. <\/span><\/p>\n

I’ve had an inquiry about my academic arguments on the “Mark versus Paul” question — that is, on my thesis that Mark wrote his gospel as a direct rebuttal of Paul’s First Corinthians. To present this argument in its entirety would fill at least one big fat Zondervan text (as if Zondervan’s editors would publish such a thesis!) so all I can do at this stage is present a brief list of comparisons between the two texts. I’m aware that in order to build a case for each “talking point” in a complete academic format — a format that would be acceptable to a peer-reviewed journal — would require many months of research for each point and a long research paper for each. The work would go faster, however, if others were willing to help. If you’re interested in helping with this project, please contact me.<\/span><\/p>\n

I’m going to present some of the major contrasts I see between First Corinthians and the Gospel of Mark. I’ll assume for this purpose that the extant copies of these two books represent with a fair degree of accuracy the original texts as they were written by Paul and Mark respectively, with the exception of Mark 16:9-20 (the very ending of Mark), which is generally believed to be a later addition.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you want to see which researchers I rely on, please refer to the post called “The Author’s Research Bibliography” (http:\/\/jesusredux.blogspot.com\/2011\/03\/authors-bibliography.html<\/a>).<\/span><\/p>\n

I use more than one form of biblical criticism — more than one analytical tool — in this comparison. I tend to start with traditional methods — socio-historical criticism, source criticism, form criticism, and redaction criticism — and then I cross-reference these arguments with recent scientific insights from quantum theory, neurophysiology, psychotherapy, archaeology, and recent historical findings. I also use my own personal mystical faculties, but I won’t apologize for this, since insights derived from mystical conversations are only a starting point, not an ending point. Other researchers get “aha” moments and call them intuition, or divine revelation, or just plain ol’ personal brilliance. Me, I’m being honest about where I get my starting point for this discussion. After that, it’s up to me to use logical human tools to make my case.<\/span><\/p>\n

Fortunately for me, what Jesus and my angels pointed out to me leads to an extremely strong case.<\/span><\/p>\n

To the best of my knowledge, there are no biblical scholars currently publishing on this topic. So this is original research you’re reading. You’ll probably wonder straight away how I — an obscure blogger from Canada who has no PhD and no publishing record of note — could see evidence of a book-to-book biblical feud that nobody else has seen. To this I must reply that the feud has been obvious “to those who have eyes and those who have ears” (Mark 8:18) since these two texts began to circulate simultaneously in the latter part of the 1st century CE. Christians have always been called to decide whether they choose Paul’s teachings or Jesus’ teachings (even if they haven’t been able to articulate the choice in scholarly terms). However, it’s only now that Christians are getting round to being honest about this fact.<\/span><\/p>\n

If Mark had simply written about entirely different themes than Paul did, there would be no point in trying to show that Mark wrote his gospel as a rebuttal of Paul’s First Corinthians. But Mark didn’t <\/em>write about different themes than Paul did. He wrote about exactly the same topics and inverted them. He also chose his words as carefully as Paul did. He never uses Paul’s favourite word: nomos<\/em> (Greek for law, authority, unbreakable tradition). Nor does Mark use the words charis<\/em> (grace) or elpis<\/em> (hope). The words nomos<\/em>, charis<\/em>, and elpis<\/em> are part of the vocabulary of apocalyptic thought. And Mark is trying to show, contrary to Paul’s claims about Jesus, that Jesus himself rejected<\/em> apocalyptic thought.<\/span><\/p>\n

Mark never uses the words nomos, charis, <\/em>and elpis<\/em>. But for a man who never uses these words, he talks about them a lot in his book. He talks about what it means for a person of faith to be in full relationship with God the Mother and God the Father.<\/span><\/p>\n

Here is a point form list of some of the direct comparisons. I reserve the right to edit, modify, add to, and clarify this list whenever additional information comes to light in future. If information is suggested to me by other writers, I will so note the contribution(s).<\/span><\/p>\n

Concerns of Form:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

1. Viewpoint Character<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> The viewpoint character is Paul himself.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> The viewpoint character is Jesus; the author (Mark) is not present; reference to “a certain young man” in Mark 14:51 may indicate an eyewitness to whom Mark later spoke about events surrounding Jesus’ arrest.<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Narrator’s Voice<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> The narrator speaks in first person (Paul himself).<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Third person narration.<\/span><\/p>\n

3. Literary Genre<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> Written as a letter; uses rhetoric, exhortation.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Written as a biographical narrative interspersed with parables, sayings, and teaching actions (i.e. teaching chreia<\/em>).<\/span><\/p>\n

4: The Narrative Hook: “The Hero’s Journey”<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> The hero Paul recounts highlights of his long and arduous journey to save the Gentiles; the focus is on important urban centres; the hero’s personal journey is a metaphor for the path of spiritual ascent (i.e. the vertical path that leads to salvation and eventual bodily resurrection).<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> The hero Jesus takes many small trips around a small freshwater lake; the focus is on unimportant outlying communities; the hero’s journey is horizontal, not vertical; the path is not straight; bad things happen on high hills; g<\/span>ood things happen near boats and water.<\/span><\/p>\n

Theological and Social Concerns:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

5. Relationship to the Jerusalem Temple:<\/span><\/strong>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> The physical Temple has been replaced by Jesus and “believers” (1 Cor 3:9-17; 6:19-20); the Temple is now purely mystical; it is more important than ever. (Note: the actual physical Herodian Temple was still standing in Jerusalem at the time Paul wrote his letter and Mark wrote his rebuttal).<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> The physical Temple exists and is the centre of corruption in Palestine (Mark 11:12-24;12:35-44; 15:38).<\/span><\/p>\n

6. Relationship to the city of Jerusalem:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> Jerusalem is still favoured as shown by the collection for the Jerusalem church (1 Cor 16:1-4).<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Jesus spends little time in Jerusalem; healing miracles all take place outside the city; Jesus’ friends live outside the city; Jerusalem is the place where genuine faith withers away (Mark 11).<\/span><\/p>\n

7. Healing Miracles:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> No mention of healing miracles.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Several healing miracles take place; the theme of healing is introduced early on and repeated until Jesus reaches Jerusalem.<\/span><\/p>\n

8. People With Disabilities:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> No special mention of individuals with physical or mental illnesses or disabilities or special needs.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Those deemed “impure” according to Jewish custom and law are healed, touched, spoken to in violation of purity laws.<\/span><\/p>\n

9. The Kingdom of God:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> The Kingdom is a reality outside the self; it depends on power (1 Cor 4:20; 15:24-28; 15:50).<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> There is no simple explanation of the Kingdom, but empathy is central to it (Mark 10:13-31; 12:28-34).<\/span><\/p>\n

10. Relationship of Body to Soul:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> Influenced by Platonic dualism.; the flesh is corrupt (1 Cor 3:1-4; 7:8-9; 9:24-27; 15:42-49). Souls are in peril without belief in Christ.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Holistic attitude toward the body; non-Platonic and non-Covenantal; flesh is not impure or corrupt; right relationship with God involves caring for the body. Souls live as angels in the afterlife (Mark 12:24-27)<\/span><\/p>\n

11: Forgiveness:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> No mention of forgiveness.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> The theme of forgiveness is introduced early on (Mark 2:1-12); both God and humans can forgive (Mark 11:25).<\/span><\/p>\n

12: The Definition of Human Virtue:<\/strong><\/span>
\nIn Paul:<\/span> “Foolishness” (morias<\/em>) and unquestioning faith are the highest expressions of right belief (1 Cor 1:10 – 2:5); obedience, fellowship, holiness, “strong consciousness,” and the proper exercise of freedom are emphasized.<\/span>
\nIn Mark:<\/span> Courage (ischys<\/em>) and a questioning faith are the highest expressions of right belief (Mark 8:11-21); egalitarianism, service, forgiveness, and insight (suneseos<\/em>) are emphasized.<\/span><\/p>\n

0<\/span><\/a><\/div> <\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0A: Today, I’m shifting back into academic mode on the question of what Jesus actually taught 2,000 years ago — as opposed to what the Church says he taught. I’ve had an inquiry about my academic arguments on the “Mark versus Paul” question — that is, on my thesis that Mark wrote his gospel as […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2403,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[131,114,62,17,70,86,238,28,121,157,95,97,130],"tags":[290],"class_list":["post-129","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-apocalyptic-prophecy","category-faith","category-first-corinthians","category-gospel-of-mark","category-healing-miracles","category-jerusalem-temple","category-jesus-redux","category-jesus-teachings","category-kingdom-teachings","category-mark-versus-paul","category-mother-and-father-god","category-paul-versus-jesus","category-pauls-teachings","tag-mark-versus-paul"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=129"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2974,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129\/revisions\/2974"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/jenniferthomas.ca\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}